Background
This project involved the appraisal and review of the research evidence
on complementary therapies in the NHS priority areas as defined by
Government policy prior to the start of the project. These areas were:
cancer, mental health, heart disease and stroke, and chronic conditions
(arthritis, asthma, chronic back pain, diabetes, multiple sclerosis).
The therapies included in the project were acupuncture, Alexander
technique, aromatherapy, chiropractic, homeopathy, herbal medicine
(specific products), hypnotherapy, massage, meditation, osteopathy,
reflexology and yoga.
Aims
• To carry out a detailed review and critical appraisal of the
published research on specific complementary therapies
• To make this information available to health care professionals,
researchers and the public via the Internet
• To maintain an evidence-based information resource that reflects
current research evidence
Project organisation
The main project team consisted of a project director, project manager,
two research assistants and an information specialist. An advisory
group consisting of representatives from the National
Library for Health, Cochrane
Collaboration, NHS Centre
for Reviews and Dissemination, a complementary and alternative
medicine (CAM) organisation and a patient organisation provided advice
on overall strategy and methods. Clinicians and therapists were recruited
to provide condition and therapy specific advice and to comment on
the clinical relevance of studies. External experts were consulted
on specific aspects of the topics and to provide overall comments
on each review.
Methods
The scale and complexity of the project required a range of processes
and methods to be developed and tested. The methods used for each
of the reviews involved comprehensive searches of electronic databases
which were followed by the filtering and categorising of articles
according to the study design. Basic methodology of relevant articles
was appraised, and commentaries provided by clinical specialists.
Reviews were sent for external comment and then either submitted for
publication in peer-reviewed journals with a summary on the CAMEOL
(Complementary
and Alternative Medicine Evidence OnLine) database, or published
in full on CAMEOL. The later stages of the project required planning
for the integration of the methods and outcomes of the work into the
newly established National Library for Health (NLH) CAM Specialist
Library (www.library.nhs.uk/cam)
Outcomes
This project succeeded in bringing together a wide range of research
literature on complementary therapies in chronic and life-threatening
illnesses in a short space of time. The main outcome was a new resource,
the CAMEOL database, providing access to summaries and full details
of the research on each topic including unpublished and ongoing studies,
tables of studies incorporating methodological appraisals and clinical
comments, and links to relevant evidence. Supplementary outcomes included:
a review of currently available electronic sources of CAM information,
development of search strategies for a range of CAM therapies, investigations
into the contribution of non-English language and qualitative research
and into the quality of reporting of CAM interventions in research
studies. Furthermore, the project established a framework and system
for ensuring that evidence-based knowledge of CAM can be available
to both professionals and the public.
An evaluation of the search methods has been conducted
and the results published. The overall methods for the cancer reviews
have also been evaluated in collaboration with the Penny
Brohn Cancer Centre and the resulting recommendations incorporated
into development of a cancer-specific information service. Knowledge
generated by the project has been shared with/transferred to other organisations
including the CRD and Cochrane Collaboration.
The majority of the work has been or will be integrated in the near
future into the NLH CAM Specialist Library by means of National Knowledge
Weeks (NKW) and Annual Evidence Updates (AEU). These are initiatives
carried out by the Specialist Libraries aimed at highlighting the ‘best
current evidence for selected healthcare topics’ (www.library.nhs.uk/specialistlibraries/).
The work on cancer is being progressed through a project by the University
of Plymouth in collaboration with the Penny
Brohn Cancer Centre while it is anticipated that work on the other
major area, mental health, will continue at the University
of Westminster. The supplementary study on qualitative research
will continue as part of a project led by colleagues at the Peninsula
College of Medicine and Dentistry School (Universities of Exeter
and Plymouth).
Summary of the outputs
• 12 systematic reviews and overviews published in journals and
27 systematic reviews and overviews published on CAMEOL
• 13 reviews of reviews transferred to the NLH CAM Specialist
Library
• 3 published papers relating to the methods
• 3 published papers on the overall project
• Ongoing projects based on the work on cancer, mental health
and qualitative research in CAM
• Collaborative information-based projects (an international collaboration,
an initiative to establish a European CAM information centre, development
of the NLH CAM Specialist Library)